Legal Battle Over Seized Documents Unfolds in Michigan
In a significant legal stand-off, the Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC) is seeking judicial intervention to withhold certain documents seized during a recent raid, citing them as privileged content. The MEDC’s appeal emerges amidst an ongoing investigation led by the state’s attorney general.
The controversy centers around documents taken on June 18 by state investigators during a search of MEDC’s Lansing headquarters and the Farmington Hills residence of Fay Beydoun. Notably, Beydoun, a former MEDC board member and fundraiser for Governor Gretchen Whitmer, is at the heart of the investigation.
Otie McKinley, the MEDC’s Media and Communications Manager, expressed the agency’s concerns via email, stating, “We have initiated the appeal process because the attorney general’s office took privileged materials without allegation of any wrongdoing on the part of MEDC — even stating to the court MEDC is not a suspect or under investigation. This sets a dangerous precedent for attorney and client relationships with implications significantly broader than this specific case.”
The probe is focused on a $20 million grant from the 2022 budget, approved by the Republican-led Legislature and signed by Whitmer. This grant was allocated to a business accelerator operated by Beydoun, which raised suspicions when it was discovered that its expenditures included items like a $4,500 coffeemaker and an $11,000 first-class plane ticket, as well as six-figure salaries for only two employees. More details on the expenses can be found here.
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, addressing the issue, highlighted existing protocols for independent assessments of what documents are privileged. She emphasized her commitment to safeguarding public funds, stating, “I see it as my job as state attorney general to make sure that we don’t see state tax dollars being misused, and so I’m going to continue to do my job and it is my hope that MEDC will also place great value on making sure that state tax dollars are not abused that way.”
Nessel expressed her concerns about MEDC’s resistance to the investigation process, saying, “And so it’s a little bit alarming and concerning and also disappointing to have MEDC pushing back in the way that they have. We have this process in place so that we can fully protect the attorney-client privilege and to protect everybody’s rights.”
While the legal battle over the documents continues, the state asserts it will shift its attention to other facets of the investigation until the court reaches a decision.
Report contributions by MPRN’s Colin Jackson.
—
Read More Michigan News
