Hearing on Trump-era Migrant Deportations to Third Countries Held

A human rights commission reviewed the U.S. policy of deporting migrants to third countries, sparking legal challenges.
Inter-American Commission hears testimony from migrants, asylum seekers impacted by deportations

Human Rights Commission Reviews U.S. Deportation Practices

A significant review of U.S. deportation policies unfolded this week as a multinational human rights commission convened to examine the implications of the Trump administration’s strategy of redirecting migrants and asylum seekers to nations other than their own.

In Guatemala City, nearly 24 rights groups from various regions participated in a hearing conducted by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. The focus was on what is termed “third country deportations,” a procedure facilitated by agreements the U.S. has with close to 30 countries.

Margaret Cargioli, directing attorney for policy and advocacy at the Immigrant Defenders Law Center, highlighted the testimonies of individuals such as a Venezuelan man who was deported to CECOT, a maximum-security facility in El Salvador. “We’re at the one year anniversary of that moment where we saw those men getting off the planes and it’s a time to really commemorate what happened to them,” Cargioli expressed. “It’s important that the people who are being removed to these third countries are not silenced.”

Last March, at least 240 Venezuelan men were sent to CECOT under a war-time authority, bypassing the usual legal processes. According to an analysis by the Libertarian think-tank Cato Institute, nearly 85% of these individuals had no criminal records in the United States. More details can be found here.

Although many of these men have reportedly been returned to Venezuela, they were denied the opportunity to legally contest their deportations.

In a recent development, a federal court in Boston declared the deportation practice of relocating individuals to third countries without prior notification unconstitutional. The administration has since appealed the decision, and the case remains active in the judicial system. Further information on the ongoing lawsuit is available here.


Read More Arizona News

Share the Post:

Subscribe

Related Posts