Dispute Over Legislative Bills Heads to Michigan Governor’s Desk
The Michigan Court of Appeals has sided with Senate Democrats, deciding that nine bills, previously adopted by both legislative chambers, should be sent to Governor Gretchen Whitmer. These bills, although passed when Democrats controlled the legislature, were not forwarded to the governor before Republicans assumed leadership in the House at the start of the year.
House Speaker Matt Hall (R-Richland Township) had directed the House clerk to retain the bills, citing that the new Republican majority wasn’t bound to complete unfinished business from the preceding Democratic leadership. However, the appeals court clarified that under the Michigan Constitution, forwarding these bills is a mandatory action, not a choice. This interpretation supports a prior ruling by a Michigan Court of Claims judge, who decided not to mandate the release of the bills, citing separation of powers concerns. The appeals court, however, has sent the case back to the Court of Claims, highlighting that the judiciary has the power to enforce such orders.
Judge Thomas Cameron, appointed by former Republican Governor Rick Snyder, emphasized the judiciary’s role in interpreting constitutional rules, stating, “The question here involves the interpretation of the rules and requirements imposed by our Constitution.” He further explained that the legislative body must adhere to constitutional directives, and these interpretations are the judiciary’s responsibility unless specific exceptions apply.
Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks (D-Grand Rapids), who initiated the lawsuit, praised the court’s decision as a triumph for constitutional adherence. She stated in an email, “At a time when Republican leaders across the country are breaking the law and getting away with it, this is a particularly meaningful win. No matter how deep our political differences, the Constitution must be followed.”
The contested bills propose several measures, including protecting public assistance payments from debt collection, enabling Detroit historical museums to seek voter-approved millages, and integrating corrections officers into the same pension system as Michigan State Police officers.
While a spokesperson for the House Speaker refrained from commenting, it remains possible for Hall to challenge the decision by appealing to the Michigan Supreme Court.
—
Read More Michigan News
