Michigan Court Mandates Return to Performance-Based Foster Care in Kent County
In a notable legal decision, Michigan’s Court of Claims has reinstated a distinctive foster care management system in Kent County that emphasizes performance, reversing recent administrative changes. This ruling marks a potential revival for a nonprofit overseeing these operations for several years.
Sonia Noorman, CEO of the West Michigan Partnership for Children (WMPC), expressed enthusiasm about the court’s decision, saying, “We’re very excited.” Her organization had taken legal action against the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) following funding cuts made in October. “We’re still fully staffed, operational, ready to go if and when the department reaches out,” Noorman added.
Uniquely, Kent County’s foster care system has operated under a state-mandated “performance-based” model, unlike other counties in Michigan. WMPC has been the designated local agency managing this approach. However, a budget amendment removed the agency’s mention, leading MDHHS to assume administrative duties, asserting that the change did not impact the 426 children involved as the foster care agencies continued their direct services.
Under the existing framework, both WMPC and MDHHS do not directly provide foster care. Instead, they supervise a network of five agencies responsible for the placements. WMPC maintains that its oversight enhanced the standards and consequently improved results for children and families.
Noorman highlighted the inability to monitor the children post-transition, stating, “So I’m really hopeful there hasn’t been any interruption of service. I think this system really impacts outcomes for children more long-term.”
WMPC claims that its administration has reduced the duration children spend in foster care and increased their placements with relatives. It has also developed specialized care for children requiring additional attention. However, MDHHS questioned these outcomes, pointing to a University of Michigan study that suggested results were not significantly better compared to other counties, while also noting higher costs under WMPC’s management.
The court’s ruling, authored by Judge Christopher Yates, appeared to favor WMPC, acknowledging that their services resulted in “measurably improved outcomes for the children.” Yates also affirmed the necessity for a performance-based and prospective payment system in Kent County, where agencies receive payment upfront, differing from other counties.
Despite ruling in favor of WMPC’s operational model, Yates noted that the court could not mandate MDHHS to subcontract with WMPC as before. He allowed MDHHS a 30-day period to devise a compliant system.
Noorman mentioned that WMPC had reached out to MDHHS post-ruling but was awaiting a response. Michigan Public sought comments from MDHHS on the state holiday but received no immediate reply.
—
Read More Michigan News
