Historic Unionization Vote for Michigan’s Home Care Workers
In a significant move towards improving working conditions, thousands of home health care workers across Michigan have chosen to unionize, according to a recently announced tally. This decision follows a pivotal state law from last year that redefined individual home help caregivers as public employees, thus enabling collective bargaining.
The law also established the Home Help Caregiver Council, which functions as the employer for union negotiations. This development marks a renewed effort to restore collective bargaining rights that were previously granted to homecare workers under agreements with the now-defunct Quality Community Care Council, a setup that was dismantled by a 2012 policy change.
Ruby Farmer, who has dedicated four decades to caring for her son, joined the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) last June. She expressed enthusiasm over the unionization, stating, “It’s a voice for us. Something that we have been missing in the state of Michigan for homecare workers.”
Gabriella Jones-Casey from SEIU Healthcare Michigan highlighted the benefits of previous union contracts, which included higher wages, a worker registry, and improved conditions. She emphasized the importance of the union as a “vehicle… to meet the needs of the times,” allowing workers to advocate for necessities such as training, healthcare access, and wage improvements.
The preliminary results of the vote indicate a strong majority in favor of unionization, with over 75% support, translating to 4,205 votes for and 1,502 against. Official confirmation awaits the five-business-day period for filing objections, as per the Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity.
However, the unionization effort faces legal challenges. The Mackinac Center of Public Policy has initiated a lawsuit led by Senior Attorney Derk Wilcox, contesting the state’s authority to classify individuals as state employees solely for union purposes. Wilcox argues that this action contravenes the state constitution, specifically Article 11, Section 5, which outlines the civil service’s jurisdiction.
Wilcox also contends that unionization imposes unnecessary obligations on workers, compelling them to attend union-led training sessions. “Whether they choose to join or pay the union, the union still speaks on their behalf,” he explained.
As the legal proceedings continue in the Michigan Court of Claims, the union’s initial focus in contract negotiations remains uncertain. However, discussions have touched on key issues such as pay and training opportunities. Ruby Farmer reiterated the importance of union dues, stating, “Union dues are part of the training, it’s part of the negotiating process, it’s part of getting you the benefits that you need.”
—
Read More Michigan News
