Michigan State Police Leaders Face Criticism and No-Confidence Vote

The Michigan State Police (MSP) leadership is under scrutiny following a report by the Michigan House Oversight Committee, which accuses the top officials of fostering a “toxic environment” that has driven morale to unprecedented lows. The findings have sparked debates about leadership integrity and accountability within the agency.

According to the report, Colonel James F. Grady II and Lt. Colonel Aimee Brimacombe are alleged to have engaged in “dishonesty,” “retribution,” and making “unexplainable promotions and demotions.” The report was compiled through interviews with nine current and former MSP employees and a review of internal documents.

These internal conflicts were highlighted in June when two significant police associations expressed no confidence in MSP’s leaders and pushed for their resignations. Representative Matthew Bierlein (R-Vassar), vice chair of the Oversight Committee, remarked on the stressful nature of the job, emphasizing, “Any organization that lacks trust, it adds to the stress that already exists in an, in an already stressful job.”

While the committee did not formally request Grady’s resignation, Bierlein suggested he should step down. He stated, “If the colonel is not willing to take on the accountability, I do think that at this point, the governor should step in and make a change.”

Governor Gretchen Whitmer, who appointed Grady in 2023, has shown support for his leadership. Spokesperson Stacey LaRouche highlighted Grady’s “steady, principled leadership” and his role in reducing violent crime statewide, dismissing the criticisms as “partisan attacks.”

Toxic Environment Allegations

The report suggests that Grady’s decisions on promotions and demotions appeared to prioritize loyalty over merit. It cites instances where seasoned officers faced demotions allegedly as punitive measures and as warnings against dissent.

Lt. Colonel Brimacombe’s rapid ascent to her current position was scrutinized, especially given her previous conduct investigations. The report noted her promotion from a low-level managerial role to second-in-command shortly after being ineligible for advancement due to past conduct issues.

One notable issue raised was Brimacombe’s use of a company vehicle for “nearly 10,000 miles” despite her remote role, a matter reported by Division Commander Tom Deasy. Initially, she claimed it was to prevent battery issues, but later admitted using the vehicle for personal commutes. Her return of the vehicle was only prompted by direct intervention from senior management.

Brimacombe, labeled by some as leading through fear, announced her retirement days before the report’s release and has not commented on the findings.

Colonel Grady responded to the allegations, asserting his commitment to the Michigan State Police’s mission. “My focus continues to be on doing what’s best for the agency, our members, and the people of Michigan,” he stated, emphasizing ongoing efforts to reduce violent crime.