Michigan Voters to Decide on Constitutional Convention Amidst Major 2026 Elections
As Michigan gears up for a pivotal election in 2026, voters are not only preparing to choose their next governor, secretary of state, attorney general, and a U.S. Senator but also to make a crucial decision about the future of the state’s constitution. On the ballot is the question of whether to convene a constitutional convention—referred to as a “Con-Con”—to potentially rewrite the entire state constitution.
According to state law, this referendum appears on Michigan’s ballot every 16 years. Despite being a recurring option since the state adopted its current constitution in 1963, Michigan voters have consistently opted against holding such a convention. The upcoming decision, however, falls within a uniquely charged political environment, prompting questions about whether this time the outcome might differ.
The 2026 ballot promises to be packed, with not only key political offices at stake but also the entire state House, Senate, and Michigan’s Congressional delegation positions up for election. Additionally, various potential ballot initiatives are currently gathering signatures, adding to the decision-making load for voters.
In a recent podcast episode of It’s Just Politics, Eric Lupher, President of the non-partisan Citizens Research Council of Michigan (CRC), and Nancy Kaffer, Editorial Page Editor at the Detroit Free Press, discussed the possible advantages and drawbacks of a constitutional convention. Their insights aim to shed light on what such a significant legal overhaul might entail for Michigan’s future.
—
Read More Michigan News
