University of Michigan Ends Gender-Affirming Care for Minors Amid Federal Pressure
In a significant policy shift, the University of Michigan has ceased offering gender-affirming medical treatments to minors, attributing the decision to pressure from the Trump administration. This development follows a federal subpoena, prompting concerns from various advocacy groups.
The university disclosed its decision in a statement issued Monday, explaining: “The University of Michigan, including Michigan Medicine, is one of multiple institutions across the country that has received a federal subpoena as part of a criminal and civil investigation into gender-affirming care for minors. In light of that investigation, and given escalating external threats and risks, we will no longer provide gender affirming hormonal therapies and puberty blocker medications for minors.”
Opposition from LGBTQ+ advocates was immediate, with Erin Knott of Equality Michigan stating that the institution “has chosen to retreat,” sending a “chilling and damaging message” to vulnerable youth. Despite these challenges, gender-affirming care remains legal in Michigan.
According to Samuel Bagenstos, a law professor at the University of Michigan, the investigation is based on a legal premise not supported by state law. He expressed disappointment, noting the impact on trust between families and the institution.
Federal Investigation and Its Implications
The details of the federal subpoena remain undisclosed, but the Department of Justice has reportedly issued over 20 subpoenas to various healthcare providers involved in transgender care for minors, as noted by The Washington Post and The New York Times. These subpoenas reportedly request extensive confidential patient information.
Pressure from the Trump administration’s actions has influenced more than 20 healthcare providers to halt gender-affirming care for minors, as reported by NBC. This aligns with a broader trend of federal investigations, including one into religious exemption claims at the University of Michigan.
Legal and Community Responses
Michigan’s Attorney General Dana Nessel has joined a multistate lawsuit to counteract federal actions perceived as deterrents to providing necessary medical care to minors under 19. This lawsuit emphasizes Michigan’s legal protections against discrimination based on gender identity.
Jay Kaplan from the ACLU of Michigan criticized the university’s decision as a “capitulation,” suggesting that the institution could have contested the federal actions. Meanwhile, some state legislators, like Representative Jason Woolford, praised the university’s decision as a protective measure for children.
Most major medical bodies, such as the American Medical Association, continue to advocate for gender-affirming care for minors, opposing legislative bans.
Impact on Families and Future Care Options
Michigan Medicine has pledged to support affected patients, offering referrals for mental health and continuity of care. The health system previously provided hormone therapy and puberty blockers but not surgical procedures. Roz Keith from Stand with Trans described the decision as devastating, highlighting the clinic’s unique role in providing comprehensive care for transgender youth.
Stand with Trans is actively compiling resources and alternative care options for affected families. For more information, families can visit the Stand with Trans website or contact them via email.
Note: The University of Michigan holds Michigan Public’s broadcast license.
—
Read More Michigan News
