WASHINGTON — Over 30 Senate Democrats strongly oppose the U.S. Education Department’s plan to transfer responsibilities to other federal bodies, expressing their disapproval in a letter to Secretary Linda McMahon. The senators labeled the move as “outrageous” and “illegal,” arguing it bypasses appropriations law, jeopardizing vital funding for students, teachers, and families nationwide.
The letter, led by senators including Patty Murray, Tammy Baldwin, Bernie Sanders, and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, criticized the administration for its disregard for federal laws. Murray, Baldwin, and Sanders hold key positions on committees overseeing Education Department funding and its implementation.
“This is the latest example of this administration’s complete lack of regard for our laws,” the senators wrote, highlighting concerns about the plan’s impact on federal education law implementation.
Department dismantling
The Education Department revealed six partnership agreements with other departments, aiming to decentralize education oversight, a move that prompted backlash from Democrats and advocacy groups. Announced on Nov. 18, the initiative is part of President Trump’s broader strategy to reduce federal involvement, advocating for state-level control over education.
McMahon defended the strategy as a means to eliminate “bureaucratic bloat.” However, senators argued it would create more bureaucracy, straining states, school districts, and educational institutions.
They urged McMahon to abandon the plan and instead focus on initiatives that genuinely enhance educational outcomes.
Appropriators object
The senators emphasized that Congress has not authorized the Education Department to shift programs and funding to other agencies. They pointed out that “appropriations law prohibits the transfer of funds to another federal agency unless expressly authorized.”
Concerns were raised about the potential expertise loss, with the Department of Labor assuming a larger role in managing educational programs without the necessary experience. Programs like TRIO and GEAR UP, vital for supporting disadvantaged students, might suffer under this transition.
The lawmakers also criticized the administration for lacking detailed implementation plans, with no clear information from agencies assuming new responsibilities.
The department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday.
—
Read More Montana News
