Arizona Lawmakers Tackle Legal Hurdles for Prescott Rodeo Funding

Republican lawmakers are attempting to bypass a court challenge to allocate $15.3M for Prescott rodeo improvements.
Lawmakers try to sidestep block on Prescott rodeo funds

Arizona Lawmakers Seek Resolution for Prescott Rodeo Funding Amid Legal Battle

In a bid to resolve a prolonged legal dispute, Republican legislators from Arizona are attempting to unlock $15.3 million designated for renovations at the Prescott rodeo grounds, a funding initiative that remains entangled in a court challenge two years after its allocation. The controversy hinges on a constitutional provision that prohibits the state from gifting public funds to private entities, with the Prescott Frontier Days rodeo’s managing nonprofit at the center of the debate.

Judge Scott Blaney of the Maricopa County Superior Court is poised to deliver a verdict on whether this financial disbursement contravenes the state constitution. Should the court find the allocation unlawful, the funds will revert to Arizona’s general fund, as stipulated by last year’s budgetary provisions.

Meanwhile, lawmakers representing Prescott, Sen. Mark Finchem and Rep. Quang Nguyen, are advocating for alternative methods to ensure the funding reaches the rodeo grounds, irrespective of the court’s decision. Their strategies, however, diverge on the mechanism to accomplish this legally.

Sen. Finchem’s proposal involves reallocating the funds directly to the City of Prescott, which owns the rodeo site and plans significant upgrades. Finchem’s approach, embodied in Senate Bill 1583, secured Senate approval and is now pending House evaluation. “What the underlying bill does is, No. 1, would make the case that’s currently before the court moot because it would eviscerate the whole argument that you can’t give money to a private entity,” Finchem stated.

The House Appropriations Committee, however, replaced Finchem’s language with an amendment by Rep. Nguyen. This amendment also redirects funds to the city but activates only if the court deems the original allocation illegal. Both legislative paths aim to achieve similar outcomes, but the nuances are critical, as highlighted by Rep. David Livingston, chairing the Appropriations Committee.

The original allocation emerged from 2023’s budget discussions, during a time of fiscal surplus. Lawmakers had leeway to allocate funds to preferred projects, with Nguyen and Rep. Selina Bliss dedicating $15.3 million to the rodeo grounds’ renovation. Despite the legal dispute, Nguyen maintains the allocation’s legality, citing precedents where funds were channeled to nonprofits for various initiatives.

Prescott’s city officials, including Mayor Phil Goode, emphasize the rodeo’s economic significance, attracting tens of thousands annually and generating substantial economic activity. “This event supports hundreds of jobs, generating $13 million in labor income and $33.5 million in economic impact from goods and services,” Council member Cathey Rusing noted, underscoring the rodeo’s $50 million annual economic contribution.

The legislative debate over the funding has rekindled scrutiny of the broader practice of earmarking funds for specific projects, a method some lawmakers from both parties now question. Rep. Nancy Gutierrez voiced concerns over such allocations, suggesting funds might better serve statewide needs like child welfare programs.

As the Prescott funding bill progresses, the conversation continues around the best practices for budget allocations, with key figures like Rep. Matt Gress and Rep. Livingston advocating for more cohesive statewide initiatives over fragmented earmarks for individual district projects.


Read More Arizona News

Share the Post:

Subscribe

Related Posts