Amidst the changing landscapes of Northern Arizona, Brantley Baird reminisces about the past while contemplating the future. His family’s roots run deep in the town of Snowflake, where they witnessed the arrival and departure of railroads and the rise and fall of cattle empires. Now, the coal-fired power plants that once fueled the region’s economy are at a crossroads, with the Cholla Power Plant recently ceasing operations.
Located near Baird’s burgeoning museum, the Cholla Power Plant has long been integral to the local economy, providing both jobs and tax revenue for Joseph City and nearby areas. However, due to stringent environmental regulations, Arizona Public Service found it uneconomical to continue the plant’s operations, leading to its shutdown in March.
Despite the closure, President Donald Trump has taken steps to revive coal energy, signing executive orders promoting “beautiful, clean coal.” His administration has urged a reconsideration of Cholla’s fate and other coal plant retirements, as part of a broader strategy to bolster domestic energy resources, including coal, to drive advancements in artificial intelligence and other technologies.
While Trump’s actions have reignited hope among some community members, including Baird, there remains skepticism about the practicality of reversing the trend toward coal plant retirements. “As many jobs as it gives people, as much help just to our school district right here that we get out of there, we’re hoping that it will come back, too,” Baird remarked, reflecting on the plant’s significance.
Coal-Burning Plants Facing Retirement
Prior to Trump’s announcement, the U.S. Energy Information Administration forecasted a substantial 65% increase in coal-fired plant retirements by 2025. Among these is Utah’s 1,800-megawatt Intermountain Power Project, slated for replacement by a facility utilizing natural gas and hydrogen.
Despite Trump’s orders, utility companies remain hesitant to invest in coal, as articulated by Todd Snitchler, CEO of the Electric Power Supply Association, “I think it’s safe to say that those plants that are scheduled or slated to retire are probably still going to move in that direction, for a couple of reasons.” He emphasized the challenges of planning significant environmental retrofits based solely on executive orders.
The closure of other plants like the Navajo Generating Station and the San Juan Generating Station has already impacted local economies, warning of potential repercussions for communities like Joseph City, heavily reliant on power plants for economic stability.
Community Concerns and Alternatives
While the idea of renewable energy gains traction, resistance to projects like the proposed wind farm in Springerville is strong. Concerns about the visual and environmental impacts of wind turbines fuel opposition, with community members advocating for the repurposing of existing coal plants to preserve jobs and natural landscapes.
“We also survive on tourism and people don’t want to come here and look at that,” said Springerville Mayor Shelly Reidhead, underscoring the community’s apprehension toward wind energy.
In the face of potential economic voids, Springerville’s leaders are exploring alternative industries to sustain the local economy. The potential for new energy projects, facilitated by reduced regulatory hurdles, offers a glimmer of hope for maintaining employment and economic viability.
Meanwhile, the construction of a major solar and battery storage project near Joseph City underscores the shift toward renewable energy. Although Baird is wary of the dust from the construction, he recognizes the inevitability of change, remaining open to the possibilities that lie ahead.
—
Read More Arizona News
