Michigan House Passes Bill to Lower Income Tax Rate to 4.05%

Michigan’s income tax rate may drop from 4.25% to 4.05% due to a bill passed in the House, but faces Senate hurdles.
Michigan House approves 0.2% income tax cut, sends bill to Senate

Michigan House Approves Potential Tax Cut to Restore Previous Rates

The Michigan House has greenlit a new bill that could see the state’s income tax rate decrease from 4.25% to 4.05%. This move aims to revert the tax rate to its 2023 level, when a temporary law reduced taxes due to high revenue. However, a court decision later classified the reduction as temporary, contrary to the belief of some that it should have been permanent.

The proposed legislation not only seeks to lower the current rate but also ensures that any future reductions prompted by the law are maintained in subsequent years. Representative Kathy Schmaltz, a Republican from Jackson, sponsors the bill, arguing for the permanence of the 2023 tax cut. “Taxes jumped back up last year, so everybody got a tax increase. My bill would make things right,” Schmaltz remarked during a legislative session.

Considering data from the U.S. Census Bureau regarding median household income, this tax adjustment could yield savings of approximately $130 per household, though the exact benefit would vary.

Despite the potential savings, not all legislators are in favor. Representative Jasper Martus, a Democrat from Flushing, opposed the bill, stating, “We saw the reduction from 4.25 to 4.05 in a previous fiscal year. The vast majority of my constituents never noticed it.” The adjustment would be effective this year, with a projection by the House Fiscal Agency indicating a possible $2 billion reduction in state revenue over the next few fiscal periods.

Further criticism comes from Representative Morgan Foreman, also a Democrat, who raised concerns about the potential loss of public services without significant benefits to residents. Foreman and Martus advocate for a graduated income tax system that taxes lower earners at reduced rates rather than implementing a uniform cut. Foreman emphasized the need for adequate funding for public amenities, stating, “We want the better roads. We want the remarkable schools. We want to pay for the great higher education that we have in this state. But we can’t do that if we’re playing along with these joking tax bills.”

Despite these objections, Schmaltz and her Republican colleagues argue that the tax cut would be universally beneficial, suggesting that recent state budget surpluses justify returning funds to taxpayers. “The passage of this bill will put hundreds of millions of dollars back into the pockets of over 5 million taxpayers. That means everyone has more money they can use for groceries, gas, school supplies, or saving for the future,” Schmaltz claimed.

The bill now awaits consideration by the state Senate, which is under Democratic control and may not prioritize the proposal.


Read More Michigan News

Share the Post:

Subscribe

Related Posts