In an unprecedented legal situation, the Michigan Supreme Court seems poised to become the next battleground over legislative procedure after a decision regarding the transmission of certain bills to the governor. This development could redefine the extent of judicial authority over legislative affairs in the state.
Republican leaders in the Michigan House have announced plans to challenge a recent ruling that mandates the delivery of nine bills, which were approved last year, to Governor Gretchen Whitmer for action. House Speaker Matt Hall stated, “We’re going to appeal the decision. We’re going to appeal to the Supreme Court.”
The conflict arose when the Democrat-majority Senate sued the Republican-controlled House, arguing that the Michigan Constitution obliges all bills passed by both legislative chambers to be sent to the governor. Republicans, however, label this situation as a matter internal to the Legislature, suggesting that they are not bound to remedy the inaction of the previous Democratic majority.
A Court of Claims judge initially sided with the Senate’s interpretation but acknowledged a lack of authority to enforce the transmission of the bills. Contrarily, the appeals court determined that the judiciary does possess the power to compel the House to adhere to constitutional mandates, as noted in their decision to require the House to send the bills to the governor.
While the House GOP has yet to file its formal appeal with the Michigan Supreme Court, Senate Democrats are withholding comments until the appeal is officially submitted. “We’re curious to see what kind of argument they put forth in appeal to justify it,” stated Rosie Jones, spokesperson for the Senate Democratic majority.
There is no specified timeline for when the appeal will reach the Supreme Court, leaving the legislative and judicial branches in a state of anticipation.
—
Read More Michigan News
