Michigan Supreme Court’s 6-1 Majority and Its Political Implications

Governor Whitmer’s appointment of Justice-designate Noah Hood solidifies a 6-1 Democratic super-majority in Michigan.
MI Supreme Court set to lean even more progressive after Whitmer appointment

Michigan Supreme Court’s Political Dynamics: A Closer Look

Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s recent appointment of Noah Hood to the Michigan Supreme Court has solidified a dominant Democratic presence, though it doesn’t alter the court’s political balance as significantly as it might seem. This appointment enhances the court’s Democratic majority to a 6-1 super-majority, which remains non-partisan in name but politically influential in practice.

Historically, the court’s composition has played a crucial role in landmark rulings, including allowing pivotal proposals on reproductive rights and redistricting on the ballot. More recently, the court dismissed a Republican initiative affecting labor laws on sick leave and minimum wage.

Currently, Justice Brian Zahra stands as the sole Republican on the bench, known for his conservative rulings, particularly against LGBTQ and abortion rights. His seat is not up for election until 2030.

Richard Primus, a law professor at the University of Michigan, observes that although the new majority doesn’t drastically shift the court’s center, its presence is significant as state courts gain prominence nationwide. “The federal courts lean very heavily conservative,” he notes, highlighting the importance of state courts as a counterbalance.

Michigan’s unique judicial election system, often referred to as the “Michigan Method”, adds an interesting dimension to the court’s dynamics. While justices are technically non-partisan, they are typically nominated by political parties, with those affiliations remaining unlisted on ballots.

Noah Hood will need to run in the 2026 election to retain his seat, but his status as an incumbent offers an advantage. He is expected to seek the Democratic nomination to continue as a non-partisan candidate.

Past campaigns have utilized creative strategies to emphasize the importance of voting in judicial elections. For instance, Democratic-nominated Justice Conrad Mallett Jr. famously reminded voters, “You Haven’t Finished Your Ballot Until You’ve Voted for Mallett.” Similarly, a viral video in 2012 featured The West Wing cast endorsing candidate Bridget Mary McCormack, leading to her successful election.

Although rare, non-partisan candidates have successfully run for the Michigan Supreme Court. Justice Charles Levin, for example, served from 1973 to 1996 as an independent, despite the political connections in the Levin family.

For further insights into Michigan politics, listen to the It’s Just Politics podcast and subscribe to receive updates directly in your inbox.

For more details, visit: Michigan House Republicans’ Budget Bills.

If you have any questions or suggestions about Michigan politics, feel free to contact us at politics@michiganpublic.org.

Current Political Conversations

Election Materials Subpoena: The Michigan House Oversight Committee has issued subpoenas to Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson for election materials. Benson argues that much of the requested information has already been shared, but some sensitive data requires further review. Republicans challenge this stance, accusing her of withholding transparency.

Trump’s Return to Michigan: President Donald Trump is set to visit Michigan to mark the first 100 days of his second term. His presence underscores Michigan’s significance in upcoming elections, including the U.S. Senate and governor races, as well as key House seats.

Discussion on Trump’s First 100 Days: Join NPR’s Asma Khalid and Domenico Montanaro for a discussion on covering Trump’s presidency, part of the Michigan Public’s Speakers Series. More details are available here.


Read More Michigan News

Share the Post:

Subscribe

Related Posts