Despite a nationwide Democratic surge in the U.S. Senate elections, Montana’s Senate race defied the trend with the Democratic candidate securing only 12% of the vote. This outcome prompted debates among party members over the impact of independent candidates.
Party loyalists argued online that an independent candidate’s presence derailed Democratic chances. Emily Marburger, the party’s state director, echoed this sentiment, criticizing the rise of independents. She suggested that Seth Bodnar should have run as a Democrat to prevent a split vote.
Marburger emphasized, “Really, what I’m looking at now is Seth Bodnar should have run as a Democrat if he wanted to run. He should have looked at the playing field.” Many believe the split vote hindered a potential Democratic win in Montana.
The vote split between Bodnar and Democrat Alani Bankhead garnered a combined 226,309 votes, surpassing Republican Kurt Alme’s 223,427. However, Libertarian Kyle Austin’s 2% share was not factored into the perceived split that benefitted Alme.
Kevin Smith, a political scientist, highlighted complexities in this vote dynamic. He noted parallels with Nebraska, where independent candidate Dan Osborn outperformed Democrats due to negative perceptions of the party. He explained how wavering Republicans might back independents but not traditional Democrats.
Montana’s political landscape saw Bodnar attracting more votes in rural counties than Democrats in previous years, as noted by Jeremy Johnson at Carroll College. He observed, “Even in the most Republican counties, he’s doing better than Democrats did two years ago, significantly so.”
Ballot measures also saw significant support, with initiatives against corporate spending in elections and for preserving nonpartisan judicial races receiving over 65% approval. In the Supreme Court race, Amy Eddy successfully emphasized nonpartisan values over party affiliation.
Nancy Keenan, a former party chair, emphasized the need for Democrats to form coalitions. She highlighted polling showing 42% of Montana voters identify as independents, suggesting an alliance approach could be crucial for future success.
Keenan criticized the lack of a strong Democratic Senate candidate, pointing to financial constraints and low name recognition. She remarked that none from the primary could have successfully challenged Alme, who she believed would have exceeded 50% of the vote.
Late changes in the Republican field, with Steve Daines withdrawing in favor of Alme, left Bodnar as the only fully prepared candidate. Keenan noted a growing preference for candidates willing to cross party lines, reflecting on Bodnar’s appeal as meeting independent expectations.
“I think people on both sides of the aisle are wanting somebody that is not just so strict, one side or the other,” Keenan said, indicating a move towards a more bipartisan political climate in Montana.
The post Independent Bodnar bid leaves Montana Democrats divided appeared first on Montana Free Press.
—
Read More Montana News
