New rules from the Montana Republican Party may conflict with the state Constitution by imposing loyalty oaths and penalizing officials, including the governor, for opposing party leaders, a judge indicated on Monday. Lewis and Clark County District Judge Michael McMahon made these observations during a four-hour hearing on whether to make a current restraining order against the state GOP permanent. Central to the case are the bylaws passed at the June platform convention, which oblige party members and elected Republicans to affirm support for the party and allow revocation of membership for conduct inconsistent with party goals as judged by executive officers.
Judge McMahon challenged attorney Justin Oliveira on how these loyalty oaths align with Article 3, Section 3 of the Montana Constitution, noting elected officials must adhere to their official oath. The case arises amid GOP internal battles, where hardliners clash with centrists who have allied with the governor and Democrats on key issues like balancing the state budget and adjusting home tax policies.
Oliveira argued that the bylaws might not lead to disciplinary actions as feared by plaintiffs, including various party committees and lawmakers. “This whole case is hypothetical,” Oliveira said. The bylaws, however, raise concerns about government loyalty, with McMahon questioning their potential to hinder bipartisan efforts beneficial to Montana residents.
At the June GOP convention, nine Republicans were disenfranchised, forced to stand aside as Art Wittich, advocating for strict vetting of party members, was elected chairman. Rep. Brad Barker, a plaintiff, criticized the exclusion of these senators from voting for party leadership, asserting their right to represent constituents. Barker, previously declared non-Republican by the executive board, highlighted the party’s vetting practices and won his primary by a significant margin.
The hearing also covered precinct officers, elected individuals serving crucial grassroots roles. In Flathead County, over 60 new officers were elected, reflecting a surge in public engagement. These officers now face mandatory dues and loyalty pledges, with potential expulsion for conduct against party objectives. Former legislator Frank Garner warned these rules enable private entities to oust duly elected officers.
Some committees contested their exclusion from the lawsuit, citing insufficient notice of bylaw changes. Jennifer Fielder, a rules committee member, defended the bylaws as voter-endorsed measures to prevent Democratic infiltration. However, attorney Mike Talia contended party rights should balance public interests and state benefits. Judge McMahon has given both parties two weeks to submit further briefs before a final decision on the bylaws.
—
Read More Montana News
