Article Summary –
Voters in Colorado, Kentucky, and Nebraska rejected private school voucher measures, showing bipartisan opposition to taxpayer-funded private school tuition. Critics argue vouchers harm public schools, lack regulation, and don’t improve education outcomes. Despite setbacks, voucher expansions continue in states like Texas and North Carolina.
Colorado, Kentucky, Nebraska Voters Reject Private School Choice Measures on Election Day
In a significant setback for the private school voucher movement, voters in Colorado, Kentucky, and Nebraska rejected ballot measures aimed at either instituting or expanding private school choice programs. These decisions reveal widespread opposition to diverting taxpayer funds for private school tuition.
The rejections, notably in traditionally conservative Kentucky and Nebraska, highlight bipartisan resistance to using public money for private education, despite its popularity within the Republican Party. In Kentucky, a proposal to amend the state constitution for public funding of private education was defeated across all counties. Nebraska voters partially repealed a state-funded scholarship program, and Colorado rejected a measure to constitutionally guarantee school choice.
Advocates for public schools see these results as a clear disconnect between voucher supporters and public sentiment. During a call with reporters, National Education Association President Becky Pringle emphasized the “stunning public rebuke,” stating, “The public recognizes that vouchers harm students and weaken schools.”
Voucher programs redirect tax dollars from public to private schools, raising concerns about a lack of accountability and standardized testing. Research indicates that charter schools are often inadequately regulated, impacting educational quality.
Charter and voucher programs often do not serve children with disabilities, unlike public schools which are obligated to educate all students. Currently, 28 states and Washington D.C. have at least one private school choice program, with evidence lacking to prove these schools outperform public schools. Some recent studies suggest the opposite. Expansions like those in Arizona led to soaring costs and significant cuts to public education budgets.
In Iowa, data shows that most voucher recipients were already in private schools, highlighting subsidies for families already affording tuition. Following expansions, private schools raised tuition, further questioning the benefits of such programs. Despite these issues, states like Texas and North Carolina are pushing forward. Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a staunch voucher supporter, favors new legislative candidates to push through voucher initiatives. Similarly, North Carolina Republicans plan to override a veto on voucher expansion.
Pringle insists, “Vouchers harm students and our democracy.” She urges efforts to emphasize public schools’ importance and opposes misleading voucher policies that don’t advance student success.
—
Read More North Carolina News
