As proposals for new data centers emerge across Montana, residents seek input on upcoming projects from companies like Quantica and Atlas Power. Recent citizen ballot initiatives show a desire for public approval before developers can construct new data centers. This reflects a community need to influence local data center development, including power consumption concerns.
Another call for more input occurs at the Montana Public Service Commission (PSC), an elected utility board responsible for balancing utility financial health with customer interests who cannot choose other providers.
Since NorthWestern Energy, Montana’s largest utility, proposed a new rate structure for large electricity loads 2.5 months ago, nine entities have sought PSC approval to participate. These filings are crucial for understanding power-supply factors impacting the future of data center projects in Montana.
WHAT EXACTLY IS NORTHWESTERN PROPOSING?
NorthWestern Energy has proposed a new rate structure for customers needing 5-50 megawatts of electricity, with a separate proposal for those requiring over 50 megawatts. These guidelines primarily target data centers but also apply to other industries requiring significant power, such as manufacturing. Companies in the 5-50 megawatt category must sign a five-year service agreement, with financial penalties for early contract termination. Additional terms include a maximum load limit and prioritization of other customers’ needs during emergencies.
Customers needing more than 50 megawatts face a different rate structure, with a minimum contract length of 15 years. Their usage must remain above a specified level. Furthermore, the PSC must approve these agreements before NorthWestern can supply electricity. NorthWestern claims these measures will prevent existing customers from shouldering the costs associated with infrastructure development for new, energy-intensive customers. The company also believes facilitating data center development will boost economic growth, infrastructure investment, and job creation.
“There is strong competition across the country to secure new data center customers for the benefits they provide not only to the utility, but also for other customers of the system and the communities in which the data centers are sited,” NorthWestern wrote in its filing. “Their high load factor supports grid stability and their contribution to revenue can help offset existing system fixed costs for all customers. They bring tax revenue to the state and local governments.”
WHO WANTS TO WEIGH IN ON NORTHWESTERN’S PROPOSAL AND WHY?
- The Montana Consumer Counsel. A small state agency representing utility customers in PSC matters seeks to engage broadly, providing limited details compared to other intervention requests.
- The Large Customer Group. Comprising eight of NorthWestern’s largest industrial clients, it argues that the new large load tariff will impact its members directly. They emphasize the need for fair and reasonable tariffs from all perspectives.
- A coalition of environmental and citizen groups. This coalition, including various nonprofits, aims to support fair rates given the energy development and environmental connection. They stress transparency to protect NorthWestern Energy’s existing ratepayers.
- Montana Department of Environmental Quality. A state agency managing environmental regulations for power plants and other large systems, it presents its energy planning expertise.
- Northwest and Intermountain Power Producers Coalition. Comprising 22 regional electricity players, this group seeks to protect its market share from new NorthWestern customers.
- Missoula County. Concerned about infrastructure costs and power pricing for its clean energy program in conjunction with NorthWestern.
- The City of Missoula. Similar to the county, it stresses electricity affordability and the impact of NorthWestern’s financial condition on its operations.
- Tony O’Donnell. A former PSC member, O’Donnell offers expertise in cost allocation and analysis, emphasizing his interest as a NorthWestern customer.
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
The PSC and NorthWestern Energy will review intervention requests shortly. The final list of participants should be determined by early July. Subsequently, parties will exchange financial and planning documents, and the PSC will schedule a hearing. NorthWestern will argue for its tariff proposal, while other parties will present their perspectives on its approval. The PSC process will follow a quasi-judicial format, similar to other utility rate cases.
According to Amanda Webster, the PSC’s chief lawyer, a briefing will be held after the hearing, with a decision expected within four months. The 2027 commission may address the matter, with some seats up for election in November. Webster noted that a decision on the proposed merger between NorthWestern and Black Hills Corp is likely before the new tariff is finalized.
—
Read More Montana News
