Detroit Tenants Union Sues Over Eviction Practices to Force Compliance

Detroit Tenants Union sues to improve housing safety, challenging evictions for properties without compliance certificates.
Detroit Tenants Union Sues Over Eviction Practices to Force Compliance

Detroit’s rental market is on the brink of a major shift as tenants and landlords face off in court over housing compliance. The lawsuit filed by the Detroit Tenants Union against the 36th District Court could reshape the city’s rental landscape, impacting both tenants’ living conditions and landlords’ business operations.

In a legal battle that could significantly alter Detroit’s housing scene, the Detroit Tenants Union has initiated a lawsuit against the 36th District Court. The union’s aim is to ensure that landlords can’t collect rent or evict tenants from properties lacking a certificate of compliance, a mandatory city inspection clearance. Currently, only 14% of Detroit’s rentals meet this standard.

The lawsuit, as explained by Steven Rimmer, a leading figure in the Detroit Tenants Union, is a direct attempt to ensure landlords address substandard housing conditions. Rimmer emphasized that tenants are “forced to fight for the most basic living standards” while landlords continue to earn rent. The case, if successful, could compel landlords to comply with city regulations, but landlords warn it could also lead to higher rents and more foreclosures.

Matt Temkin from Greatwater Opportunity Capital expressed concern over potential consequences like increased property abandonment and illegal evictions. Detroit’s media relations director, John Roach, acknowledged these risks, noting a likely increase in rent and decrease in available housing. However, he also pointed out that the current situation has left tenants in “unsafe and uninhabitable conditions.”

Paying for Safety

For renters like Alexis Hernandez, affordable housing has come with unexpected costs. Her home, lacking a certificate of compliance, suffered from numerous issues including heating failures and lead exposure, which severely affected her family’s well-being. Hernandez stated that the low rent wasn’t worth the risk, highlighting a widespread issue in Detroit’s rental properties.

There are fewer than 12,000 rental properties with compliance certificates in Detroit, out of an estimated 85,000. The city’s struggle to enforce regulations has led to troubling conditions in many homes, as documented by Outlier Media and others.

In response to these challenges, Detroit has updated its rental ordinance to streamline inspections and has launched initiatives to assist landlords with compliance. The goal is to bring thousands more properties up to code in the coming year.

Cost vs. Safety

Landlords are grappling with the financial burden of maintaining old properties amidst high taxes and insurance rates. Sean Tidwell of Tidwell Group warned of potential business collapses if tenants withhold rent. He noted that updating a single property can cost up to $40,000, necessitating rent increases to cover expenses.

Despite these challenges, the Detroit Tenants Union argues that economic difficulties shouldn’t justify neglecting housing standards. Rimmer insisted that tenants shouldn’t endure unsafe conditions due to landlords’ financial constraints. Donovan McCarty from Michigan State University’s Housing Justice Clinic echoed this sentiment, arguing that unlawful practices should not sustain the housing market.

The court’s upcoming decision on September 21 will be crucial in determining the lawsuit’s impact on Detroit’s rental market.

This article originally appeared on Outlier Media and is republished under a Creative Commons License.


Read More Michigan News

Share the Post:

Subscribe

Related Posts