New Legislation Targets Campus Encampments Amidst Controversy
The enactment of a new state law has sparked a debate on the balance between security and freedom of expression at state universities. The legislation, signed by Gov. Katie Hobbs, mandates that university officials order the immediate removal of protest encampments, with non-compliance leading to trespassing charges.
Governor’s spokesperson, Christian Slater, highlighted the necessity of this measure, stating, “The purpose of this legislation is to reinforce and strengthen existing policies, ensuring our universities and community colleges have tools available to ensure all students can learn and thrive safely, while protecting the ability for every student to engage in free speech.”
Bipartisan support and opposition marked the journey of this proposal, introduced by Rep. Alma Hernandez, D-Tucson. Hernandez cited pro-Palestinian protests at the University of Arizona and Arizona State University as catalysts, noting instances where Jewish students felt threatened and had to navigate campus differently.
Despite incidents being handled by police with force at times, neither university nor the Arizona Board of Regents advocated for this change. During Senate discussions, Sen. John Kavanagh supported the bill, arguing that protesters were monopolizing university property and intimidating Jewish students.
Conversely, Sen. Lauren Kuby questioned the need for such restrictions, emphasizing the historical role of universities as hubs for public discourse and dissent. Existing state laws already allow educational institutions to impose restrictions on demonstrations to protect institutional interests.
The legislation not only criminalizes encampments but also mandates disciplinary actions against non-compliant students. Rep. Anna Abeytia opposed the bill, equating encampments to historic sit-ins significant in Chicano culture, stating, “As an activist at heart, this is not a good bill for those of us who are activists and do go out and protests.”
Concerns were raised about potential misuse of the law to suppress protests, with Rep. Quanta Crews warning it could be “weaponized against different groups that are not intending to harm other students and are just trying to exercise their First Amendment right.”
Technical objections also emerged regarding the vagueness of banning items like tents for “a prolonged period of time.” Sen. Analise Ortiz feared this could inadvertently include benign activities like setting up sun shades.
Rep. Alexander Kolodin criticized potential bias in enforcement, suggesting conservative groups might be targeted more than others. He questioned whether the law would be applied equally, saying, “Is this bill really going to be used against Students for Justice in Palestine? Probably not.”
Defending the legislation, Hernandez pointed to previous encampments at the University Arizona, asserting that protestors refused to vacate and presented unreasonable demands, including divestment from certain companies and other political actions.
—
Read More Arizona News
