Michigan House Passes Controversial Road Funding Plan
The Michigan House recently approved a Republican-backed initiative aimed at redirecting over $3 billion to improve the state’s road infrastructure. This move involves reallocating funds from fuel taxes and corporate taxes, sparking debate among lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.
Representative Jamie Thompson (R-Brownstown), a co-sponsor of the plan, emphasized that the proposal is a strategic reallocation of existing resources. “We’re not raising people’s taxes, guys. And we’re not saddening our future generations with additional debt from this plan. This is a funding shift with money that we already actually have,” Thompson stated in a floor speech.
The proposal designates approximately $2.2 billion from corporate income tax revenues, which would typically feed the state’s general fund, to road maintenance. House Speaker Matt Hall (R-Richland Twp) stressed the importance of prioritizing this allocation to prevent the funds from being diverted to other areas. “We need to dedicate it off the top because what’s happening now is it’s going into a discretionary pool and it’s competing with new government programs, it’s competing with all kinds of things, universities, all kinds of things,” Hall mentioned during a press session.
To bridge the gap in the general fund, Republicans propose phasing out state business incentives, leveraging a projected surplus, and cutting earmark spending. The plan also includes increasing the motor fuel tax while reducing the general sales tax on gas to offset the impact. In response to concerns about school funding, the proposal allocates $755 million from sales tax revenue to compensate for potential losses.
However, this has drawn criticism. Representative Julie Rogers (D-Kalamazoo) expressed concerns about the long-term effects on state services. “We don’t even know which programs and departments these cuts will apply to,” Rogers stated.
Despite assurances from Representative Pat Outman (R-Six Lakes), chair of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, that essential services would not be compromised, opposition remains. “We’re going to cut additional waste out of our budget. It’s not going to be that hard to do. The budget has exploded. We will go through it line by line. We will find areas in our budget that are not getting taxpayer value,” Outman assured reporters.
Democrats, largely opposing the plan, criticize it as a financial sleight of hand. Representative Noah Arbit (D-West Bloomfield) remarked, “It’s not robbing Peter to pay Paul. It’s robbing Peter and Paul. And Mary’s already dead.”
Governor Gretchen Whitmer had proposed her own solution for road funding, which included utilizing all taxes collected at the pump while increasing revenue through taxes on large corporations and the marijuana industry. Whitmer’s spokesperson, Stacey LaRouche, noted, “We are encouraged to see the legislature make roads a priority, but the current legislation moving through the House does not achieve the goal.”
Representative Alabas Farhat (D-Dearborn) supported the Republican plan, suggesting funding roads through digital advertising taxes, corporate income taxes, and raising rates to protect school funding. Meanwhile, House Minority Leader Ranjeev Puri (D-Canton) emphasized the necessity of increasing state revenue and finding a practical compromise. “The desire here for me is to stay away from the political rhetoric… We want to find a way to actually negotiate this in good faith and find a pragmatic solution that actually works,” Puri commented.
The focus now shifts to the Democratically-controlled Michigan Senate, which will determine the future of this legislative proposal.
—
Read More Michigan News
