The Biden administration has encountered a significant setback in its student debt relief initiatives, as a federal judge in Missouri temporarily halted the implementation of a plan intended to aid millions of borrowers. This development poses a challenge to the administration’s efforts to highlight its student loan initiatives ahead of the crucial November election. Persistent Republican opposition continues to challenge President Joe Biden’s student debt relief strategies.
Unveiled in April, the administration’s student debt relief plans aimed to benefit over 30 million borrowers, although these proposals were never finalized. In September, Missouri, joined by Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, North Dakota, and Ohio, filed a lawsuit in a Georgia federal court to challenge the administration’s plan.
The lawsuit emerged just days after another effort, the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan, remained blocked by the U.S. Supreme Court since late August. Following the lawsuit, U.S. District Judge J. Randal Hall issued a temporary restraining order in September, extended on Sept. 19, which was later allowed to expire as the case moved to a Missouri federal court.
In Missouri, the remaining six states promptly sought a preliminary injunction, which was granted by U.S. District Judge Matthew T. Schelp. The judge stated that the administration is prohibited from “mass canceling student loans, forgiving any principal or interest, not charging borrowers accrued interest, or further implementing any other actions under the debt relief plans.”
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey hailed the decision as a “huge win for transparency, the rule of law, and for every American who won’t have to foot the bill for someone else’s Ivy League debt,” according to his post on X. Meanwhile, the Department of Education expressed extreme disappointment over the ruling on the proposed debt relief rules, which have not yet been finalized.
A spokesperson for the department emphasized their commitment to defending the proposals in court and to fighting for a solution to the broken student loan system. The Student Borrower Protection Center criticized the Missouri decision, with Persis Yu, deputy executive director, stating that the Attorney General’s actions put political interests above the needs of borrowers.
—
Read More Montana News
