The city of Laurel is vigorously rejecting claims of discrimination against people with disabilities amid ongoing disputes with the state over a planned psychiatric facility. The city’s refusal to annex land needed for the 32-bed forensic psychiatric facility, a key part of Montana’s mental health infrastructure, has sparked allegations of civil rights violations. State lawmakers claim the city’s stance could breach the Americans with Disabilities Act and Fair Housing Act, as reported in a recent committee meeting. Laurel officials maintain their opposition stems from existing water supply challenges rather than discrimination.
During a Long-Range Planning Interim Budget Committee session, lawmakers unanimously voted to send a letter to Laurel city officials. They expressed concerns that the city’s refusal to annex land designated for the psychiatric facility might infringe on civil rights laws. The state requires the land to be annexed to secure city water services for the facility. However, Laurel has a freeze on annexations, citing insufficient water capacity for further development.
Mayor Kris Vogele expressed disappointment over the allegations, while the letter does not initiate an investigation, it could prompt inquiries from bodies like the Montana Human Rights Commission. Sen. Ellie Boldman predicted resistance to the letter, emphasizing the importance of reconsidering the city’s stance on the matter.
Vogele reiterated the city’s awareness of the urgent need for forensic psychiatric services in Montana, underscoring that the issue is not about denying these crucial services. Laurel’s infrastructure issues include water intake failures and low pressure, leading to a one-year annexation moratorium.
In response to the letter, city officials promptly sent a detailed response, urging reconsideration and a review of city engineering and water study records. Vogele is awaiting feedback from state legislators and has demanded clarity on any investigations concerning Laurel. Meanwhile, the interim committee recommended suspending state funding to municipalities under investigation for discrimination, a move some lawmakers criticized as coercive.
With ongoing legal challenges from local residents regarding water supply concerns, the state is defending its plans for the psychiatric facility. The committee’s deliberations continue to underscore the tension between state requirements and local governance in ensuring civil rights compliance.
—
Read More Montana News
