Montana’s attorney general race pits current incumbent Austin Knudsen against Democratic challenger Ben Alke, highlighting the stark contrast in leadership style and priorities. Knudsen, known for his aggressive stance against federal agencies under Democratic President Joe Biden, portrays himself as a protector of the vulnerable in his campaign ads. In contrast, Alke criticizes Knudsen’s tenure, citing chaos and mismanagement within the state’s justice department.
Alke, a Bozeman-based attorney from Helena, highlights Knudsen’s professional challenges, including low ratings from the Montana Highway Patrol and an ongoing misconduct hearing. “I’m concerned about how our justice system is functioning,” Alke stated, emphasizing the need for impartiality and adherence to the law. Knudsen, who declined an interview, maintains his administrative role as head of the Montana Department of Justice, overseeing various divisions like the Motor Vehicle Division and the Montana Highway Patrol.
Knudsen’s past actions, such as intervening in a Helena criminal case and the controversial use of state troopers at a hospital, have drawn criticism. Alke argues these moves were politically motivated and inappropriate. The Montana Legislature appointed special counsel to investigate the hospital incident, clearing the patrol but finding undue pressure from officials.
Alke aims to hire experienced attorneys who left under Knudsen, focusing on consumer protection and joint lawsuits only when Montanans are wronged. With roots deeply entwined in state governance, Alke proposes limiting partisan lawsuits and restoring professionalism within the Department of Justice, setting the stage for a complex and crucial electoral race.
—
Read More Montana News
