The Supreme Court is set to hear two pivotal cases that may redefine the separation of church and state and significantly impact public education. Mahmoud v. Taylor involves families challenging a Maryland school system for denying them the right to opt-out of LGBTQ+ book lessons, claiming it infringes on their First Amendment rights. Meanwhile, Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond questions if a religious charter school can operate publicly in Oklahoma.
The Oklahoma case focuses on the St. Isidore of Seville Virtual Charter School, which was approved by a state board but later opposed by Attorney General Gentner Drummond for being sectarian. The petitioners argue that blocking the school violates their rights under the First Amendment. Critics argue that favorable rulings could blur the lines between church and state in education, possibly transforming public schools into religious entities.
Rachel Laser, president of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, expressed concerns about the potential shift toward religious education in public schools, stating, “The whole idea is to have churches take control of education for American children. It’s about money and power.” On the other hand, some conservative groups see this as an opportunity to expand school choice and allow religious instruction in public education.
Legal experts anticipate the court may favor the petitioners, based on past rulings that prohibit discrimination against religious entities receiving state resources. A decision in favor of St. Isidore could redefine public charter schools, which are traditionally nonsectarian, as private entities. Steven Green, a professor at Willamette University, warns that such a ruling could introduce religious programming into public schooling.
In the Montgomery County case, parents wish to exclude children from LGBTQ+ curriculum, arguing it clashes with their beliefs. While historically limited opt-outs have been standard, broader exclusions could disrupt educational consistency. Sarah Brannen, author of an LGBTQ+ book featured in the curriculum, warns that allowing such interference could complicate educators’ roles.
The outcome of these cases may reshape the educational landscape, possibly allowing religious teachings in publicly-funded schools. Opponents argue this could undermine the foundational principles of public education and democracy.
—
Read More Kitchen Table News
