In a move that could reshape the electoral landscape for school boards, legislative Republicans in Arizona are pushing a new bill. This proposed legislation, SB 1441, would require that ballots clearly display the partisan affiliations of candidates for school board positions starting next year.
The proposal has sparked debate, with proponents arguing it’s a step toward transparency, while opponents see it as an unnecessary politicization of education. Rep. Matt Gress, a Republican with a background on the Madison Elementary School District board, emphasized that political influences are already present in school board elections. “That bus has left the yard,” he remarked, noting the involvement of political parties in supporting candidates.
Sen. Mark Finchem echoed this sentiment, questioning the nonpartisan nature of school board elections. “Sometimes it feels like, to me, that this is just kind of a cover, a fig leaf, that we put on what really is partisan,” he stated.
The bill has seen unanimous support from Republican legislators, while Democrats have opposed it, highlighting a clear partisan divide. This legislative push follows an increasing trend of political issues influencing school board decisions, such as curriculum choices and library book selections.
While the Senate has approved the bill, its fate in the House remains uncertain. A similar measure was vetoed last year by Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs, who argued that it would further polarize school district governing boards. “Partisan politics do not belong in Arizona’s schools,” she wrote in her veto message.
SB 1441 is championed by Sen. Carine Werner, who serves on the Scottsdale Unified School District board. Werner recalled her own experiences as a voter, highlighting the difficulty of understanding candidates’ values without knowing their party affiliations. She noted the significant financial influence of groups like Stand for Children, which has supported Democratic candidates, and the Arizona Education Association, which has actively campaigned for Democrats.
Some lawmakers, like Sen. Analise Ortiz, argue that voters should independently research candidates’ positions rather than rely on party labels. Ortiz pointed to a study from the University of Georgia, observing the negative impacts of partisan school board elections in North Carolina, such as increased teacher turnover and reduced per-pupil spending.
Amy Carney, also on the Scottsdale school board, countered that partisan labels on ballots wouldn’t change governance styles or politicize school boards any further. Sen. John Kavanagh supported the bill, noting that party affiliation is a key identifier for voters unfamiliar with candidates.
Despite the contentious debate, the implications of the bill’s potential enactment remain uncertain, with studies showing both negative and positive outcomes from similar measures in other states.
—
Read More Arizona News
