Conservation Concerns Loom as Trump’s Potential Second Term Raises Questions
As the political landscape evolves, the prospect of a second term for Donald Trump has sparked discussions about potential impacts on federal land management. While Trump has not detailed any specific plans regarding federal lands, conservation groups are apprehensive about possible policy reversals. Concerns are particularly focused on national monuments and environmental protections that could face setbacks.
In an interview with KNAU, Ethan Aumack, Executive Director of the Grand Canyon Trust, expressed these concerns: “We’re preparing for the worst, and we’re hoping for something better than that in the coming year.” The apprehension stems from actions taken during Trump’s first term, such as the significant reduction of Bears Ears National Monument’s size.
Aumack anticipates that the administration might pursue similar strategies, potentially affecting monuments like Grand Staircase Escalante and even the newly designated Baaj Nwaavjo I’Tah Kukveni National Monument, established by President Biden. “We’re really expecting this administration to be doing more and maybe much more of the same this time around,” he said.
Legal authority regarding the alteration of national monuments remains a contentious issue. Aumack noted, “We think this is a matter that’s going to be resolved ultimately in the courts.” Many conservationists argue that dismantling monuments is unlawful and are prepared to challenge such actions legally.
Another point of concern is Project 2025, which has been scrutinized for its environmental implications. Aumack described the project’s environmental goals as aimed at “dismantling environmental protections.” The Grand Canyon Trust is keenly observing how these objectives might translate into actionable policies.
In preparation for potential policy shifts, the Trust has been strategizing for months. “We’ve gone program by program looking at what needs to be defended, what can move forward. We’ve reached out to partners extensively,” Aumack explained. The organization anticipates swift actions from the administration, especially within the first 100 days.
The potential implications for the Southwest are significant, with Aumack predicting a “very tough, very consequential four years.” He warned of possible environmental damage driven by “special interests out for political gain” and emphasized the importance of public support in mitigating such impacts.
The dialogue around these issues remains active, with stakeholders preparing for various scenarios. As Aumack concluded the conversation, he reiterated the readiness to respond to any developments promptly: “All eyes are going to be on actions taken on day one, and we’ll be ready for that.”
—
Read More Arizona News
