Nuclear Compensation Program May Be Reinstated and Expanded Under New Senate Provision
A fresh proposal to reinstate and broaden a compensation initiative for individuals affected by radiation from historical nuclear weapons testing and production has been introduced in the U.S. Senate. This development is part of the amendments to the major tax and budget policy bill.
The added provision aims to revamp the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA), which was first passed in 1990, but expired around a year ago. Originally, the act provided recompense to individuals in western states who suffered severe health issues due to nuclear activities dating back to the World War II era. The new amendment seeks to extend this coverage to additional states, including Missouri and Tennessee, and to encompass a broader spectrum of illnesses.
Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri has been a vocal proponent of expanding the program’s reach to include uranium sites in St. Louis, among other locations. His efforts resulted in the Senate passing significant changes to the program twice, though it faced obstacles in the U.S. House over budgetary concerns, leading to its lapse.
Hawley commented, “These folks deserve to be recognized for the sacrifices they made and compensated when the government has poisoned them without telling them, without helping them, without making it right. This is a chance, finally, to make it right.”
The future of the provision remains uncertain as the House reviews the Senate’s modifications. Although there is considerable Senate backing for the payments, the reception of the legislation by fiscally conservative Republicans remains to be seen, especially given the looming July 4 deadline for the broader tax bill. House leaders are considering their options regarding the Senate’s bill, whether to approve it as is or propose further changes before sending it to President Donald Trump.
Missouri’s Ongoing Struggles with Nuclear Contamination
St. Louis was integral to uranium processing during the United States’ development of a nuclear arsenal pivotal to World War II victory. However, the initiative inadvertently exposed workers and residents to radiation, a problem that persists. An elementary school was shut down recently due to the discovery of radioactive materials onsite, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is still years away from completing environmental cleanup efforts.
An investigation by The Associated Press alongside The Missouri Independent and MuckRock revealed that during the mid-20th century, the government and companies responsible for nuclear bomb production in the St. Louis area were aware of the health hazards, spills, and improperly managed contaminants but often neglected these issues.
Contamination of Coldwater Creek has left nearby residents worried about potential connections between their cancers and other serious illnesses and the nuclear waste. Although establishing a direct correlation between specific diseases and the waste is challenging, advocates for expanding the compensation program argue that there is evidence of long-term health impacts.
Following the AP’s findings, Hawley joined forces with Dawn Chapman, co-founder of Just Moms STL, who has highlighted local nuclear contamination issues. Chapman referred to St. Louis as a “national sacrifice zone,” adding, “Many of us have had extreme amounts of devastation in the form of illnesses in our families.”
Broader ‘Downwinder’ Support Under Review
The new Senate provision also seeks to extend eligibility to more areas affected by radioactive fallout from government sites. For instance, residents in New Mexico near the initial Manhattan Project bomb test site have sought recognition as they were unaware that the explosion caused ash that contaminated water, crops, and livestock. The plight of these “downwinders” gained attention after the release of the film Oppenheimer.
Senator Martin Heinrich of New Mexico stated, “Our federal government has a moral responsibility to support Americans that helped defend our country — and it has a moral responsibility to include all people who were exposed. That begins with reauthorizing RECA and amending it to include those who have been left out for far too long.”
Before the radiation compensation measure was introduced, Senator Hawley had withheld his support for the broader tax package due to concerns about Medicaid cuts and the potential impact on rural hospitals and low-income residents. While Hawley still desires improvements to the package, he emphasized the necessity of aiding radiation victims, saying, “It would be very hard for me to vote for a bill that doesn’t include (the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act). This is extremely, extremely important to me.”
—
Read More Arizona News
